A field guide for the compositional analysis of any-omics data

TP Quinn, I Erb, G Gloor, C Notredame… - …, 2019 - academic.oup.com
TP Quinn, I Erb, G Gloor, C Notredame, MF Richardson, TM Crowley
GigaScience, 2019academic.oup.com
Background Next-generation sequencing (NGS) has made it possible to determine the
sequence and relative abundance of all nucleotides in a biological or environmental
sample. A cornerstone of NGS is the quantification of RNA or DNA presence as counts.
However, these counts are not counts per se: their magnitude is determined arbitrarily by the
sequencing depth, not by the input material. Consequently, counts must undergo
normalization prior to use. Conventional normalization methods require a set of …
Background
Next-generation sequencing (NGS) has made it possible to determine the sequence and relative abundance of all nucleotides in a biological or environmental sample. A cornerstone of NGS is the quantification of RNA or DNA presence as counts. However, these counts are not counts per se: their magnitude is determined arbitrarily by the sequencing depth, not by the input material. Consequently, counts must undergo normalization prior to use. Conventional normalization methods require a set of assumptions: they assume that the majority of features are unchanged and that all environments under study have the same carrying capacity for nucleotide synthesis. These assumptions are often untestable and may not hold when heterogeneous samples are compared.
Results
Methods developed within the field of compositional data analysis offer a general solution that is assumption-free and valid for all data. Herein, we synthesize the extant literature to provide a concise guide on how to apply compositional data analysis to NGS count data.
Conclusions
In highlighting the limitations of total library size, effective library size, and spike-in normalizations, we propose the log-ratio transformation as a general solution to answer the question, “Relative to some important activity of the cell, what is changing?”
Oxford University Press