Correlation between standard blastocyst morphology, euploidy and implantation: an observational study in two centers involving 956 screened blastocysts

A Capalbo, L Rienzi, D Cimadomo… - Human …, 2014 - academic.oup.com
A Capalbo, L Rienzi, D Cimadomo, R Maggiulli, T Elliott, G Wright, ZP Nagy, FM Ubaldi
Human reproduction, 2014academic.oup.com
STUDY QUESTION Does conventional blastocyst morphological evaluation correlate with
euploidy (as assessed by comprehensive chromosome screening (CCS) of trophectoderm
(TE) biopsies) and implantation potential? SUMMARY ANSWER A moderate relation
between blastocyst morphology and CCS data was observed but the ability to implant
seems to be mainly determined by the chromosomal complement of preimplantation
embryos rather than developmental and morphological parameters conventionally used for …
STUDY QUESTION
Does conventional blastocyst morphological evaluation correlate with euploidy (as assessed by comprehensive chromosome screening (CCS) of trophectoderm (TE) biopsies) and implantation potential?
SUMMARY ANSWER
A moderate relation between blastocyst morphology and CCS data was observed but the ability to implant seems to be mainly determined by the chromosomal complement of preimplantation embryos rather than developmental and morphological parameters conventionally used for blastocyst evaluation.
WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY
Combined with improving methods for cryopreservation and blastocyst culture, TE biopsy and CCS is considered to be a promising approach to select euploid embryos for transfer. Understanding the role of morphology in blastocyst stage preimplantation genetic screening (PGS) cycles may help in further optimizing the cycle management and clinical outcomes.
STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION
This is a multicenter retrospective observational study performed between January 2009 and August 2013. The study includes the data analysis of 956 blastocysts with conclusive CCS results obtained from 213 patients following 223 PGS cycles. Single frozen embryo transfer (FET) cycles of 215 euploid blastocysts were performed where it was possible to track the implantation outcome of each embryo transferred.
PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS
PGS was offered to infertile patients of advanced maternal age (>35 years) and/or with a history of unsuccessful IVF treatments (more than two failed IVF cycles) and/or previous spontaneous abortion (more than two spontaneous miscarriages). Prior to TE biopsy for CCS, blastocyst morphology was assessed and categorized in four groups (excellent, good, average and poor quality). The developmental rate of each embryo reaching the expanded blastocyst stage was defined according to the day of biopsy post-fertilization. Day 5 and Day 6 biopsied blastocysts were defined as faster and slower growing embryos, respectively. A novel blastocyst biopsy method, not requiring the opening of the zona pellucida at the cleavage stage of embryo development, was used. Linear regression models were used to test the relationship between blastocyst morphology and developmental rate CCS data and FET cycle outcomes of euploid blastocysts.
MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE
Among the embryological variables assessed (morphology and developmental rate), only blastocyst morphology was predictive of the CCS data. The euploidy rate was 56.4, 39.1, 42.8 and 25.5% in the excellent, good, average and poor blastocyst morphology groups, respectively. A diagnosis of complex aneuploidy was also associated with blastocyst morphology (P < 0.01) with 6.8, 15.2, 17.4 and 27.5% of excellent, good, average and poor quality embryos, respectively, showing multiple chromosome errors. Faster and slower growing embryos showed a similar aneuploidy rate. Regression logistic analysis showed that none of the parameters used for conventional blastocyst evaluation (morphology and developmental rate) was predictive of the implantation potential of euploid embryos. The implantation potential of euploid embryos was the same, despite different morphologies and developmental rates.
LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION
The study is limited by its retrospective nature. A higher sample size or a prospective randomized design could be used in future studies to corroborate the …
Oxford University Press